Anglihel English Test
Section 4: Writing. Marking rubric
Your writing is marked by AI (Claude, made by Anthropic) against the published rubric, three times independently. Essays the marker is unsure about, or that need a person's attention, are checked by an examiner before the result is released.
Each task is marked on four criteria: Task fulfilment, Coherence and organisation, Lexical resource and Grammatical range and accuracy. Each is marked from 0 to 9: 2 is A2, 4 is B1, 6 is B2 and 8 is C1, and odd marks are the bands between (9 is the top of C1). 1 is below A2; 0 means no English that can be marked. A task's level is the mean of its four marks, to the nearest level (an exact half goes down). The section level is (Task 1 + 2 × Task 2) ÷ 3, so Task 2 counts twice as much as Task 1. The highest writing level is C1.
| Mark | CEFR | Task fulfilment | Coherence and organisation | Lexical resource | Grammatical range and accuracy |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8 | C1 | Fully addresses all parts with well-developed, relevant ideas. Short message: register precisely controlled for the reader and purpose. Essay: position clear throughout; arguments developed with precise support and some evaluation or nuance. | Ideas sequenced skilfully; paragraphing well managed. A wide range of cohesive devices used flexibly and naturally, with few lapses. | A wide range used flexibly and precisely, including idiomatic and less common vocabulary with awareness of style and collocation. Only occasional slips. | A wide range of structures used flexibly. Most sentences are error-free; only occasional, non-systematic errors. |
| 6 | B2 | Addresses all parts. Short message: all content points covered with suitable detail and consistent register. Essay: a clear position is maintained; main ideas are extended with reasons and examples, though some may be over-general. | Logical organisation with clear progression. Paragraphs have a clear central idea. A range of cohesive devices used appropriately, with some over- or under-use. | A good range including some less common items. Collocation generally accurate; paraphrase used. Some errors in choice or formation that do not impede meaning. | A variety of complex structures. The majority of sentences are error-free. Errors do not impede meaning; punctuation generally good. |
| 4 | B1 | Addresses the main parts. Ideas are relevant but development is limited. Short message: most content points covered, register mostly suitable. Essay: a position is stated, but support is general or repetitive. | A connected text with basic paragraphing or clear sections. A limited range of linkers, sometimes repetitive or mechanical. Progression is mostly clear. | Enough vocabulary for the task, with some circumlocution and repetition. Errors in word choice, formation or spelling are noticeable but meaning is usually clear. | A mix of simple and some complex sentences. Reasonable accuracy in familiar patterns; errors are frequent in complex structures but meaning is usually clear. |
| 2 | A2 | Addresses some of the task in short, simple statements. Parts are missing or unclear. The purpose is only partly achieved; register may not suit the reader. | Simple sentences linked with basic connectors (and, but, because, then). Little overall organisation. | Basic vocabulary for familiar topics. Frequent errors in word choice or spelling that can make meaning hard to follow. | Simple structures and memorised phrases. Frequent basic errors (tense, agreement, word order) that can impede meaning. |